Hi all,
We submitted a CIR for Renewable Energy Production credit. However, from the ruling below, I feel that I should post it in Optimize Energy Performance. Can anyone help me clarify how to claim the savings associated with using the heat rejection from the LNG plant? From the modelling method that I proposed, does this mean I need to model purchased chilled water for both baseline and proposed cases and then deduct chilled water supplied by the LNG plant from the proposed case without claiming it as renewable energy? Additionally, since it is not renewable energy, can I claim saving for the prerequisite, Minimum Energy Performance? Thank you.
Request
Our project is a 3-story office building located on a Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal and production plant near the Gulf of Thailand (Climate Zone 1A per ASHRAE 90.1-2010). Due to the process of vaporization of LNG to natural gas, water is fed into the plant and therefore, a large amount of chilled water at 5 C is generated as by-product. Normally this chilled water is discharged to the sea, however, our project aims to recover that chilled water to be used for the cooling of the building. The design team is planning to pump this chilled water to the buildingâs air handling units in order to cool the interior spaces.
The project proposes to claim this by-product chilled water as a renewable energy source since it is a waste from a gas production process that otherwise be drained to the sea. In the energy simulation, we will model both Baseline and Proposed cases to utilize purchased chilled water according to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Section G3.1.1.2 and use the same chilled water cost rate. The energy modelsâ scope will account for downstream equipment such as pumps. The amount of cooling energy supplied by the chilled water from the gas production plant will be used to claim a percentage of energy offset by the renewable energy source.
Ruling
The project is requesting that waste chilled water, a byproduct of LNG vaporization process, be counted as a renewable energy source for this project. No, this waste chilled water does not qualify as a renewable energy source since its availability is dependent on the amount of LNG processed and natural gas is not a renewable energy source.
However, it does seem reasonable for the project to claim the savings associated with using the heat rejection from the LNG plant and modelling the baseline and Proposed case using the methodology for district cooling systems and the default chilled water energy rate appears to be reasonable. Ensure that the pumping energy from any downstream equipment is included in the Baseline and Proposed case energy consumption and costs.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
May 30, 2018 - 9:25 am
The ruling indicates that you need to use the DES which is contained in the Reference Guide. Basically your chilled water is waste cool and you get savings because its cost is free. This is a form of energy efficiency and counts toward the prerequisite.
Nuttanee Vongveeranonchai
2 thumbs up
May 30, 2018 - 9:39 am
Hi Marcus, appreciated your quick response. By DES, are you referring to purchased chilled water modelling path?
If yes, I have planned to use the same energy cost rate for chilled water in baseline and proposed cases but chilled water consumption of the proposed case will be later accounted as none because the chilled water is free, resulting in zero chilled water cost in the proposed case. Is my understanding correct?
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
May 30, 2018 - 10:36 am
DES = District Energy System.
When you model the waste cooling source how does the chilled water "consumption" show up in the modeling results?
Nuttanee Vongveeranonchai
2 thumbs up
May 30, 2018 - 11:43 am
Chilled water consumption is reported in mWh.
I treated the gas plant (waste cooling source) as an upstream side of the DES. Because I chose to model using purchased cooling, only downstream side is included in my model. I put one chilled water meter to measure chilled water from the gas plant. The chilled water consumption in MWh is then compared with the chilled water supply in MWh from the gas plant’s report.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
May 31, 2018 - 11:21 am
You should include the consumption of chilled water in your modeling results but then assign a cost of 0 to that consumption. The baseline would also include chilled water consumption using the local rate. Make sure to explain this cost disparity to the reviewer.
Nuttanee Vongveeranonchai
2 thumbs up
May 31, 2018 - 11:29 am
Thanks so much, Marcus. Your comments are really helpful.