I can't imagine the USGBC taking out non-potable water consumption out of it without giving some other incentive to pursue collection. Rainwater harvesting costs money and it's a good thing. If they disallow deduction then there isn't an incentive of doing this. It may be an oversight?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
77 thumbs up
July 21, 2010 - 11:05 am
Question would be if they are changing the template that allows you to deduct rainwater or other non-potable water volume. I think what they are getting at is that the definition of "design case" is just the flow rates without the rainwater...