We have a commercial project that is going to pursue Core & Shell. To meet energy goals of the owner, a central plant with high efficiency boilers and chillers will be installed, sized to support the common spaces AND the tenant spaces. The individual tenant fan coil units and ventilation units will not be installed, but the four-pipe system will be distributed to all tenants, and they will be required to use them (in the lease agreement). The common spaces will include full comfort conditioning. There are only two buttons on the LEED Online template, purchased or not purchased. We are purchasing MOST of the equipment, but not all of it. We are purchasing ALL of the systems related to common spaces, where we can definitely do ASHRAE 55 comfort calculations. We can find no CIRs or other guidance, but it does not seem fair that this work would go un-recognized. I think the intent is to not give this credit if you are allowing tenants RTUs or other systems that are not as efficient or flexible in application as the one we are suggesting. Has anyone had any experience with this? Are we answering the question in the template on purchasing for our common spaces (under control of the developer), or for the total building?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
ASHRAE 55-2004. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.
TECHNICAL ADVICE
1. The form indicates that the mechanical systems are purchased and installed as a part of the core and shell project scope. However, the mechanical drawings provided for PIf4: Schedule and Overview Documents indicate that the retail and restaurant HVAC systems will be installed by the future tenants. Therefore, the credit requirements must be met using a legally binding tenant sales/lease agreement (TSLA). Provide a legally binding TSLA requiring the HVAC systems installed by future tenants to comply with ASHRAE 55-2004." We have had numerous C/S projects in the past and have never had this returned as a comment. This requirement is not stated in the Ref Guide, on the credit form, or in any addenda. It is also not listed in CS Appendix 4 as one of the credits that should be addressed in the lease agreement. Any justification here for anything other than pushing back? We do not want to pester the tenant(s) yet again to amend their lease(s). The future tenant retail/restaurant space is just a portion of the SF on the ground level of a high rise building.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.