You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
NC-v4 EQc2: Low emitting materials
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc2 »
PU Foam Insulation - Emission Test ISO16000-11
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EQc2
Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EQc2
Post a new question about NC-v4 EQc2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc2 »
FAQs about EQc2:
Are throw rugs subject to the credit requirements?
What are the adhesives and sealants to be included in the documentation?
Is there a VOC budget method for this credit?
What are the limits on the VOC budget method?
Do products applied to the weather barrier need to comply with VOC thresholds?
If one part of my multicomponent wall system is not compliant, can I still get full credit?
Michelle Halle Stern
Senior Sustainability ConsultantGreenwood Consulting Group
120 thumbs up
February 23, 2016 - 12:20 pm
It must be 14 days. Significant off-gassing and thus lower emissions could happen by day 28. Otherwise it would not be a fair comparison with projects following the standard method.
Reinhard Oppl
Independent consultant on VOC issuesformerly with Eurofins Product Testing A/S
332 thumbs up
February 23, 2016 - 12:27 pm
Alternatively, you can use the ISO 16000 test result after 3 and after 28 days and compare with the European pathway of compliance: AgBB, plus formaldehyde emission after 28 days below 10 µg/m³.
Michelle Halle Stern
Senior Sustainability ConsultantGreenwood Consulting Group
120 thumbs up
February 23, 2016 - 1:49 pm
Thanks Reinhard. I was hoping you would jump in.