Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Process Chiller in a Lab Building: 90.1-2019 Baseline vs. Proposed

We're working on a 35,000 SF lab building on a campus district cooling loop. The baseline system type is #5, so there's no chilled water in the baseline. The project overcoming the process heat from the lab equipment using the district loop's chilled water (similar to using a separate process chiller). 

The question is: Will LEED accept a model that uses System Type #5's airside equipment to cool the process load in the baseline, and then uses the district chilled water to cool the process load in the proposed? 

Fundamentally, choosing to cool the process load with chilled water is an energy efficiency measure that should get credit for the energy savings. However, with our default typically being to make process loads equal between the baseline and proposed, there's been some conversation around if we need to model a chiller in both the baseline and the proposed for this case. Does anyone have experience with this situation and can offer feedback? 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 03/28/2025 - 14:41

Since this is for a process load the models should be identical. If you wish to claim savings then you would need to perform an exceptional calculation and justify the use of an air cooled system in the baseline as standard practice. 

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.