See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»
FAQs about SSc4.4 :

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the  ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

No New Parking - to document alternative compliance or not?

Default Avatar
Cynthia Ottenbrite
Project Architect
AndersonMasonDale Architects
LEEDuser Basic Member
4 thumbs up

The project is an existing building - major renovation. The existing parking lot is being ripped up to drill the geothermal wells. The lot will then be repaved and restripped with fewer parking spaces (adding parking islands). We're looking to comply with "No New Parking". Do I need to upload the original development plan with the existing parking spaces in support of this and write up a narrative as alternative compliance, or is the owner signature enough?

4
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 19:56

I would do the first submittal just with the owner signature. You will likely have the existing condition and the new site condition covered in your MPR documents so the reviewer can check your claim.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.