We are certifying a building in a campus. The campus as two commercial kitchens, one being in the building we are certifying. Typically, only the kitchen in the project building is used for all food operations for the entire campus.
Do we include all natural gas consumption in the benchmark? If so, does this not inflate the consumption of the project building to beyond what it should be? Can we split it in half if we know that at least half of the use is attributable to operations in the other building?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Jenny Carney
Vice PresidentWSP
LEEDuser Expert
657 thumbs up
January 21, 2011 - 11:43 am
Alexa - this is sort of an unusual situation, so I don't know of any precedent. However, my suspicion is that you would not be allowed to split the gas use in half for the benchmarking purposes. Usually a kitchen that is part of an office building that just serves the occupants would be classified as the main space type (office). In this case, maybe you would be allowed to classify that space as Other: Food Service. The benchmarking allocates different EUIs to different space types based on the size and other variables, so presumably if this kitchen is serving another building in addition to this one, it is larger than if it just served the project building. I would suggest asking this question directly to Energy Star, since it's a bit unusual and you'll want to be certain that you are handling it correctly.
Alexa Stone
ecoPreserve: Building Sustainability134 thumbs up
January 21, 2011 - 12:22 pm
Thanks for your help Jenny! We have asked USGBC/GBCI instead. Energy Star was not able to give an answer as to what might be accepted for LEED.
Dan Ackerstein
PrincipalAckerstein Sustainability, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
819 thumbs up
January 21, 2011 - 5:58 pm
Alexa - I actually think this might be fairly simple. The building sounds like a Case 2, Option 1 candidate which will allow you to create a weighted national average source EUI based on the square footage of the various space uses in the building. The fact that the commercial kitchen portion of the building serves other buildings on campus doesn't actually matter - the CBECS data provides a national average of a wide variety of kitchens operating with widely varying hours, capacity, and product. It's part of the beauty (and clumsiness) of that tool. But from an EBOM perspective, you probably wont be able to control for production. I guess if you wanted to make the case that your kitchen is radically more productive than most (on a per SF basis) then an alternative compliance path might be justified, but I think that the standard path is probably where you'll end up. I'll be interested to hear if USGBC agrees!