Forum discussion

EBOM-v4 SSc4:Light pollution reduction

LIghts pointing upwards

Hello, We have a very singular high-rise Project in the city centre. The light levels around the whole boundary are quite high, so we are thinking about pursuing Option 2 because the difference with the exterior lights on and off is not too big. However, the exterior lights point upwards to light the building façade. They do not spill over the boundary...but up to the sky. So, considering Option 2, would this credit be possible for us if we demonstrate the 20% lighting level compliance?

1

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 06/09/2017 - 15:47

Option 2 has no mention of uplight. This is a major difference between EBOM and NC. You can follow Option 2 for this credit and not worry about the uplight. Mostly because there's no practical way to field measure uplight over a site. Just comply with the measurements at the boundary.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.