A very specific medical equipment in our project building uses oil-sealed rotary vacuum pump as primary pump and dry vacuum pump as secondary pump. The credit requirement mandates all vacuum pumps to be dry (no oil). However, this would change the design of the medical equipment and possibly have performance impact, not mentioning additional costs and the capability of dry vacuum pump.

1. Dry vacuum pumps have advantages such as maintenance free and contamination free, but is there any more critical intent of this requirement as this is listed in a "Water Use Reduction" credit?

2. Can specific medical equipment be exempted from this credit requirement?