We have a project that is going for LEED Core and Sheel v2009 certification in a densely populated urban area and needs to pursue some form of contractual interaction with a land trust in order to achieve SSc5.1.
Per addenda # 100000737, we can "donate offsite land in perpetuity, equal to 60% of the previously developed area (including the building footprint), to a land trust within the same EPA Level III Ecoregion". However, the project owner does not own any such land that could qualify under the language of this addenda.
A colleague of mine has achieved SSc5 through LEED EBOM v2009 by working with GFEX (http://land.gfex.org/) and engaging in a Land Use Restriction Agreement. This involves signing a land offset contract with a third party where they agree to certain land conservation and preservation practices on a distinct piece of land for a certain length of time.
Is this option available to a project pursuing SSc5.1 under LEED Core and Shell v2009? Because it appears that in the language of the addenda quoted above that a project owner must physically donate land NOT engage in a contractual agreement.
Acquiring and donating 1 acre of land is not feasible for the project owner. However, engaging in a Land Use Restriction Agreement with a Land Trust or another entity is feasible.
Any clarification, insight, or success stories would be greatly appreciated.
Brian Fabella
July 23, 2014 - 12:31 pm
Are there any updates / new insight with the Land Trust option for those projects with limited landscape opportunities? I tried to contact Sam Glass at USGBC, but the email bounced back to me.
I wanted to know if the Land Use Restriction agreement [described by Colin above] was a valid option. Or if there were other types of agreements with a Land Trust that could be used, aside from purchasing and donating land to a qualified land trust. Thanks.
Brian Fabella
July 24, 2014 - 7:14 pm
Thank you for your email, Colin. It was very helpful and interesting. For others who are interested in this option, you can read this article: http://www.usgbc.org/articles/protecting-america-beautiful-how-leed-help...
Theresa Backhus
Sites Technical Specialist, LEEDUSGBC
66 thumbs up
July 28, 2014 - 12:04 pm
Hello Brian,
Pilot alternative compliance path (ACP) 83 is available for 2009 and v4 projects. The ACP involves working with the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to provide financial support rather than offsite land. The ACP language can be found here: http://www.usgbc.org/node/2756276?return=/pilotcredits
Brian Fabella
July 28, 2014 - 12:22 pm
Thanks Theresa. Will this ACP ever be opened up to allow financial support to land trusts that adhere to the Land Trust Alliance ‘Land Trust Standards and Practices’ 2004 Revision, per the original credit description ("Other Options for Urban Sites") in SSc5.1? I have spoken to some local qualified land trusts that are potentially interested.
Theresa Backhus
Sites Technical Specialist, LEEDUSGBC
66 thumbs up
July 28, 2014 - 12:34 pm
The v4 version of this credit currently includes that option (http://www.usgbc.org/node/2758192?return=/credits/core-and-shell/v4). We are always looking for ways to improve LEED, so I will explore this approach (for the 2009 credit) with the Sustainable Sites Technical Advisory Group. Thanks!