For a multifamily project registered in October 2012 should we expect living rooms to be considered multi-occupant relaxation spaces requiring varied lighting control options as described in the July 2012 IEQ Space Matrix, or is it acceptable to provide "one lighting control" for residential living rooms as stated in Note 10 of the April 2013 IEQ Space Matrix?
Thanks in advance!
Lauren Sparandara
Sustainability ManagerGoogle
LEEDuser Expert
997 thumbs up
April 12, 2013 - 12:13 am
Hi Matt,
I see how it is a little confusing. The new IEQ Space Matrix still designates Living Rooms as a Multi-Occupant Space and so it would require controllability to suit the varying needs of that space. That could happen with one lighting control with dimming or with potentially more than one lighting control if necessary. I think the language in the latest matrix that says "one lighting control" could probably be clarified to say something more like "this space is required to be included with its own controllability". It's also important to note that not all multi-occupant spaces require varied controls with many different options. I have had this conversation recently with the GBCI. There may have been a time period where reviewers were providing comments that indicated that this was a requirement for all multi-occupant spaces but it isn't actually the case. Some multi-occupant spaces require a lot of variability to suit the multiple needs of the room. In terms of a living room I would ask if you think it's necessary to have multi-switching, or dimming. My guess is that one simple light switch with some dimming combined would be sufficient. Realistically, electrical outlets for residents to plug in their own task lights would also supplement the lighting options.
Have you seen this? http://www.leeduser.com/blogs/leed-ieq-space-matrix-frequently-asked-que...