Hi Scott,
We are involved with a major addition to an existing building. We will be certifying the entire building. How do you recommend we apply the enhanced commissioning tasks to the MEP equipment serving the existing?
thanks.
Forum discussion
NC-2009 EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning
Hi Scott,
We are involved with a major addition to an existing building. We will be certifying the entire building. How do you recommend we apply the enhanced commissioning tasks to the MEP equipment serving the existing?
thanks.
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
540 thumbs up
March 30, 2016 - 7:36 am
One additional note to my post above, the MEP equipment is also existing.
I am struggling with how to apply the design review/submittal review of equipment that is currently in operation.
I suspect there will be a little "retro-enhanced Cx" on this one.
Scott Bowman
LEED FellowIntegrated Design + Energy Advisors, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
520 thumbs up
March 30, 2016 - 9:48 am
David, there seems to be two questions, the first being how to do the certification of an existing building under NC, even with the addition. The ones that I have been involved with were "major" renovations and or "major" additions, where the existing building systems were impacted significantly. I am not going to answer that one.
So, your question! I agree that you should do a mini retro-commissioning process for any existing equipment that is not going to be changed dramatically. So during your design review, perhaps you include some discovery related to the systems and what they are serving. Then you can make recommendations (if needed) on any energy saving or application updates that should be considered in the project.
Then depending on what they include, you would commission to the current or modified sequences. The retro part might be finding components that have failed, or other problems that would be addressed as a change order, or perhaps getting the owner to include an allowance to cover this kind of problem, and if it is not used, it would go back to them.
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
540 thumbs up
April 2, 2016 - 10:22 am
Thanks Scott, this aligns with our initial thoughts here at Transwestern.
GBCI is currently discussing and will be providing me with their recommended path, I'll post here once received.
As far as applying NC to existing parts of the project,,,,,that is an entirely different post - I concur.
Thanks again!