See all forum discussions about NC-v4.1 EQc2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4.1 EQc2 Post a new question aboutNC-v4.1 EQc2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4.1 EQc2»
FAQs about EQc2 :

For the insulation product category, should we demonstrate compliance based on cost or surface area?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4.1 EQc2:Low-Emitting Materials

Gym Floor Line Paint

Profile picture for user joe6
Joseph Snider
Principal
Integrative Sustainability Solutions
LEEDuser Premium Member
46 thumbs up

Has anybody run into any issues with gym floor line paint? Older info suggests to use the graphic art / sign designation in the list.  This used to be 475 g/L, but is now 200 g/L under v4.1.  We are having a hard time finding game line paints that comply, especially ones that the contractors is confident will hold up.  Has anybody seen any other guidance on this over the years, such as using a different designation?  Thank you.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user skippyjones
Deborah Lucking
Director of Sustainability
Fentress Architects
LEEDuser Expert
224 thumbs up

Fri, 08/07/2020 - 22:00

Joseph I just checked and v4.1 references CARB 2007, which still indicates the 500 g/L limit. Where are you seeing 200 g/L? 
Profile picture for user joe6
Joseph Snider
Principal
Integrative Sustainability Solutions
LEEDuser Premium Member
46 thumbs up

Thu, 08/13/2020 - 15:26

Hi!  Great call...I was looking at SCAQMD guidelines...forgot to look at CARB as an atlernate option!  Strange that the two standards are so different for graphic arts / sign.  Thanks for the response!

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.