Our project has less than 1% landscape area vs site area and therefore negligible potable water consumption for irrigation. According to the LEED criteria, this means that 4 credits will be lost (or 'not eligible') despite meeting the same credit intent as projects that provide lots of landscape and use recycled water to irrigate it.

Has this issue been raised with the USGBC previously since it seems as though projects are penalised for not installing any landscape even though the same outcome is being achieved?

In other rating tools, projects with no landscaping are rewarded for not using potable water for landscaping.

Any experiences you can share will be much appreciated.