See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 SSc4
 Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 SSc4 Post a new question aboutEBOM-2009 SSc4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 SSc4»
FAQs about SSc4 :

The LEEDuser survey template asks for the occupant’s home zipcode. Some of our occupants won’t want to provide this sort of personal information. Do we have to collect this data?

The LEED Reference Guide says that the survey should not be announced in a way that might generate skewed responses or encourage unrepresentative behavior. We’ve been educating our occupants for several months on the LEED process. What should we do?

The LEED Reference Guide says that survey results can be extrapolated to all nonrespondents if the survey response rate is 80%, but I also saw this was true for a 60% response rate. Which is correct?

My project is a retail center. Do we need to survey shoppers? What about the retail employees?

My project is a hotel. Do we need to survey guests?

My project is an educational building on a university campus. Do we need to survey students?

The LEED Reference Guide says we need to account for seasonal variations in commuting behavior, but doesn’t offer any guidance on how to do this. What should I do?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 SSc4:Alternative Commuting Transportation

Fuel efficient car vs single occupancy and 2-person carpool

One commuter drove a Civic hybrid each day to work (10 trips under fuel-efficient car). Two of those days he carpooled (4 trips under 2 person carpool) and three of those days he rode by himself (6 trips under single occupancy). My total max theoretical trips is 250 but with the hybrid figured in, I have 260 data entries and am getting a warning message in the table. How do I count the hybrid car AND the carpooling?

4
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 07/14/2011 - 18:08

Hello Andrea, That's really a tough one! I suppose a person who carpooled in a LEFE vehicle should respond only that he used the LEFE vehicle, and not that he carpooled. Think about it: on each day in which they carpooled together, for those 2 people, zero conventional vehicles were used. Therefore, 4 conventional trips were avoided on that day, right? Equivalent to both declaring that they used low-emitting vehicles. But I'm not quite sure exactly what the SCAQMD methodology says about this one, though, so I'd wait for some more insights to be sure.

Fri, 07/15/2011 - 16:22

My thought was that much like some of the MR credits, two sustainable aspects are counted for each of their merits. If I have food that is both organic and local, I get credit for both. In the transportation credit, if I have carpooling and a fuel-efficient vehicle, it should count twice. Any thoughts?
Profile picture for user danackerstein
Dan Ackerstein
Principal
Ackerstein Sustainability, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
545 thumbs up

Sat, 07/16/2011 - 03:47

Boy Andrea, you are my nominee for 'Question of the Year' at the LEEDUser awards. I've been turning this one over in my head and I'm really not sure what the right answer is. This is a really rare situation, and its hard for me to imagine that the outcome will drastically affect your numbers, but in a small building, it very well could. I think your argument about the organic and local analogy is a valid one; at the same time, I'm not sure its sensible to conceive that one persons exceptionally green commute could somehow compensate for someone else's conventional commute (effectively the case if your hybrid-poolers travel was counted as two non-CSOV commutes). I think ultimately, this is a call the GBCI will have to make - I would run your calculations both ways and submit both tables and a narrative that explains your conundrum and why the outcome matters. I suspect that ultimately GBCI will agree with your logic and the quasi-precedent set by MR, but its a toss-up. Let us know what happens! Dan

Tue, 09/20/2011 - 15:09

Here's what the review team said.... Note that trips to the building in low emitting and fuel efficient vehicles can be accounted entirely as alternative commutes, and the number of carpool passengers in the vehicle does not need to be counted. Thoughts?

Thu, 11/08/2012 - 18:52

Hi Andrea, Thanks for posting this question...good to know!

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.