Ben,
A lot of the ongoing commissioning items typically feed into a buildings normal operating plan. Checking calibration of thermostats, confirming supply temperatures, confirming functionality of lighting controls... Are the retro-commissioning items you are referring to similar to an outside air balance or another larger maintenance service?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Well I am certainly referring to all of those items you listed, as well as bigger picture items such inspection of HVAC equipment, pumps, fans, filters, motors etc. The items you listed are certainly included in my list but from what I understand the intent of the credit is for a 3rd party to complete the tasks, not the building maintenance staff. So why have a CxA come to the site to simply confirm supply temps, wait three months then come back and confirm functionality of lighting controls? The fact that LEED wants 50% completed during the performance period is confusing, wouldn't it be logical just to it all at one time?
I'm not sure a 3rd party is required for this credit. It does ask that the commissioning team take a systems wide approach that is beyond the normal operation and maintenance scope. If the operations staff contracts with a 3rd party to perform a detailed functional testing every 2 years it will certainly add great value by helping to calibrate the ongoing commissioning testing that is being performed as part of the operating plan. It should be noted that the ongoing functional testing piece of the commissioning process can be automated through a buildings BMS system. Check out this article for a case study: http://resources.cacx.org/library/holdings/050.pdf.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.