Hi LEED User-verse,
I have a project with a revolving door that is a regularly used exterior entrance. The inside of the revolving door has a permanently installed grate (that will be maintained weekly) and we're trying to determine what, if any, of the revolving door's would contribute to the 10' requirement. Would the circumference, diameter, radius of the revolving door, or none of the above contribute to the 10' requirement?
Bipin Karki
Sustainability Project Manager87 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 8:46 am
Hello Allan:
The permanent entryway system should be at least 10 feet (3 meters) long. That means none of above contribute to 10' requirement, as whole revolving area of door is considered as door. If project does not meet 10' requirement, then request for exceptions. According to LEED v4 BD+C - Exceptions to the 10-foot (3-meter) distance are allowed if the team submits documentation verifying that the proposed entryway system performs at least as well as a full-length system. Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Kristina Bach
VP of InnovationSIG
2 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 10:24 am
I haven't had the same experience as Bipin. We've definitely been able to count systems within the door.
In cases where the revolving door system includes a compliant entryway system, we've had success counting the path of travel within the door towards our 10'-0" minimum travel distance. We've done this by drawing the circumference of a circle at the midpoint of the door (i.e. the midpoint of the radius) as the assumed walking path and then measuring the distance along that path between the door entrance and exit (angle depends on how your door openings/exiting works). So a 3'-0" radius door gets us about 2'-6" to 4'-6" of travel distance depending on the size/position of the entrances/exits. We then have provided additional entryway systems inside of the building after existing the door to make up the remainder of the 10'-0" feet travel distance.
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED SpecialistSERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1980 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 1:00 pm
Allan & Bipin,
In the case of an entry vestibule, when there's walk off mat between the inner and outer door, we've seen this count toward the 10' of direction in the path of travel. It seems as though a revolving door often serves an equivalent function for both atmospheric separation and surface transition between the inside and outside.
If you Google "revolving door floor" you'll see images of some with smooth surface flooring, and some with metal grilles or walk-off mats. If the floor of the revolving door is a grille or walk mat, and the user is walking across that surface as they pass through revolving door, I would think that path of travel should contribute to the 10' distance. Would you agree?
Mohammad H Abbasi
Senior ConsultantWSP
LEEDuser Expert
18 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 1:10 pm
David,
your thought is correct, the path of travel should contribute to the length of required walk-off matt.
Bipin Karki
Sustainability Project Manager87 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 1:12 pm
Hello David,
I think I missed the part that the revolving door floor had a grille. I agree with you.
Allan Robles
Sustainability AssociateUrban Fabrick, Inc.
7 thumbs up
May 22, 2019 - 1:18 pm
Thanks everyone! Our team has some work to do, but will keep you all posted on the status as soon as it's reviewed.
Allan Robles
Sustainability AssociateUrban Fabrick, Inc.
7 thumbs up
May 31, 2019 - 2:32 pm
Hi everyone,
Getting a second opinion here. Our project team located this LEED Interpretation #2455 from seems to implicates the direction of travel for revolving doors is based on the circumference of the door frame, therefore meeting the credit intent: https://www.usgbc.org/content/li-2455. Although this was a ruling under previous versions of LEED, is this something that would still apply to LEED v4 projects?
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED SpecialistSERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1980 thumbs up
June 3, 2019 - 1:09 pm
Allan,
The interpretation only says the path of travel will "exceed" the diameter of the revolving door, and not equal the circumference, so you'd need to show a scaled drawing showing the length of the the path of travel. Since that interpretation isn't listed on the Addenda tab of the credit library, it's hard to anticipate whether it would apply to a v4 project, although it would seem reasonable. Contacting LEED Coach would be a great way to get clarification.
Allan Robles
Sustainability AssociateUrban Fabrick, Inc.
7 thumbs up
June 19, 2019 - 6:28 pm
Hi all,
Just an update from LEED Coach, in case this might be helpful for others in the future:
Technically, this LEED Interpretation is not available to LEED v4 (or even LEED v2009) projects. That being said, the LEED v4 requirements also refer to the "primary direction of travel", which in the case of a rotating door would be along a circular path, so a LEED Interpretation is not required to apply this guidance. The project team should show that the entryway system is installed along the primary direction of travel for a minimum of 10 feet. Alternatively, it should be noted that the 'Further Explanation > Selecting a Permanent Entryway System' section of this credit states that, "The permanent entryway system should be at least 10 feet (3 meters) long. Exceptions to the 10-foot (3-meter) distance are allowed if the team submits documentation verifying that the proposed entryway system performs at least as well as a full-length system".
In summary, the distance method that Kristina and David mentioned above is acceptable.