See all forum discussions about CI-2009 MRc2
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 MRc2 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 MRc2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 MRc2»
FAQs about MRc2 :

How is construction waste accounted for when utilizing off-site construction, like modular construction or pre-fabrication of assemblies?

How does MRc2 work for projects pursuing a campus approach, or any project where waste management will be shared with other construction projects?

Can materials that have been unused and returned to the manufacturer as part of a “take-back” program contribute to the credit?

Should I include hazardous material such as lead-based paint in MRc2 calculations?

Should household-type trash from workers' lunches and office use be included in MRc2 diversion and calculations?

Can sending material to waste-to-energy plants count toward MRc2?

The requirements of this credit say that land-clearing debris does not contribute to the percentage of materials diverted from the landfill. What exactly is considered "land clearing debris"?

Oops! Our trash was measured by both weight and volume at different times. How do I standardize this?

The waste management facility we are using is providing us with monthly documentation specific to our waste, showing 80% diversion. They also have a published, facility-wide rate of roughly 20%, and they have no published rate for construction waste. Will

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 MRc2:Construction Waste Management

Electronic equipment

Should electronic equipment be included in the waste calculations (should we monitor it's weight) or should it be only mentioned in the Construction waste management plan that it's exluded from the calculations because it might be treated as hazardous waste and that it will be handed over to approriate electronic waste facilities?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Default Avatar
LEEDuser Expert
472 thumbs up

Wed, 04/05/2017 - 15:21

Agata - Your second thought is correct - Exclude it from the calculations but mention it in the plan.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.