FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

DES: virtual rate and efficiency

Hello all, according to the document “Treatment of District or Campus Thermal Energy in LEED V2 and LEED 2009 – Design & Construction”, for Option1: Virtual District Hot Water Rate [$/MBTU] = Virtual Fuel Rate (in $/MBTU) x 1.59 + + Virtual Electric Rate (in $/kWh) x 3. I don't know the fuel used by the DES central plant, so i have considered only methane (the most common fuel used in Italy) with his national average rate. So that, the Virtual District Hot Water Rate is equal to 0.083 $/kWh, but the reviser thinks that it is lower than expected. Did i make any mistake? The reviser also asks me the efficiency of the district heating plant, but in theory with Option1 this information isn't required, isn't it? Thank you in advance!

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 14:54

Ciao Fabio, The value does seem low. The formula multiplies kWh x 3 so if you divide 0.083 by 3 it is a very low rate. The formula should result in $/MBTU so perhaps it is a conversion issue? I agree that the efficiency of the plant does not even enter the picture under Option 1.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 17:42

Ciao Marcus, - Virtual Electric Rate is 0.1415 [eur/kWh] * 1.301 [USD/eur] = 0.184 $/kWh - Virtual Fuel Rate (methane) is 0.39 [eur/m3] * 0.1 [ m3/kWh] * 1.301[USD/eur] = 0.051 $/kWh = 14.9 $/MBTU So Virtual District Hot Water Rate [$/MBTU] = 14.9 * 1.59 + 0.184 *3 = 24.3 $/MBTU = 0.083 $/kWh Where is the mistake? Thank you very very much

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:08

Yep seems like unit conversion issues, not a mistake. This rate seemed low for electricity, so perhaps the reviewer is confused about your final conversion of $/MBTU to $/kWh. I know we were. We use BTU as the common metric for fuel comparison, not kWh so perhaps the reviewer was thinking like we were. If you did not already, submit your calculations just like above and stop at $/MBTU. You might want to take the methane directly to BTU. There appears to be 36.3 kBTU/m3. When converting the gas I come to $14.0/MBTU and the difference could be related at least in part to rounding issues. This calculation in the DES is a bit confusing and it would have been a good idea to show the units associated with the 1.59 and 3 used in the calculation. A district hot water rate of $2.40/therm ($24.3/MBTU) is actually very high for the US but I would expect your rates to be higher. Good luck with that pesky reviewer.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.