See all forum discussions about CS-v4 MPR2
 Subscribe to new posts about CS-v4 MPR2 Post a new question aboutCS-v4 MPR2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CS-v4 MPR2»

Forum discussion

CS-v4 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundaries

Definition of "one building"

Hi all,

I have a question regarding the definition of a building. Under the 2nd requirement of the LEED v4 BD+C Reference Guide, Minimum Program Requirements section, it says that "Buildings that are physically connected by programmable space are considered one building for LEED purposes....". I am working on a project that appears to be 2  buildings at the ground level, but are connected on their two upper floors. The shared space contains loading docks for trucks, as well as trailer parking. It is possible for people to walk between the two buildings using the connected space. I am wondering whether in this case the project should be considered one building, or two separate buildings. Additionally, would it be possible for "programmable space" to be defined?

Thanks and regards,
James

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user jdharper
J.D. Lambert
Sustainable Design Leader
HKS
LEEDuser Basic Member
3 thumbs up

Tue, 08/09/2022 - 18:48

James - How are the MEP systems designed for the project? Are they interconnected over a shared structural podium of some sort? Depending on the answer, you could submit a LEEDcoach ticket to confirm the approach for the certification (as one single building or a group of buildings) so you have it in writing that they accept it.

Wed, 08/10/2022 - 13:05

(please ignore this comment)

Wed, 08/10/2022 - 13:07

Hi J.D., From what I know, the two "buildings" have separate MEP systems - in other words, each building has its own mechanical room. The only structure that connects them is a 2-level truck ramp/loading dock and a roof. I suppose in this case that makes them two separate buildings? Thank you for your advice - I will consider submitting a ticket to LEEDcoach. Regards, James
Profile picture for user jdharper
J.D. Lambert
Sustainable Design Leader
HKS
LEEDuser Basic Member
3 thumbs up

Wed, 08/10/2022 - 13:36

Sounds good! Then you could likely propose the group approach and create the boundary for the shared space depending on how the mechanical systems are divided since each building has it's own system.

Wed, 08/10/2022 - 16:34

That sounds like the right approach. Thanks again J.D.!

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.