Hi all,
I have a question regarding the definition of a building. Under the 2nd requirement of the LEED v4 BD+C Reference Guide, Minimum Program Requirements section, it says that "Buildings that are physically connected by programmable space are considered one building for LEED purposes....". I am working on a project that appears to be 2 buildings at the ground level, but are connected on their two upper floors. The shared space contains loading docks for trucks, as well as trailer parking. It is possible for people to walk between the two buildings using the connected space. I am wondering whether in this case the project should be considered one building, or two separate buildings. Additionally, would it be possible for "programmable space" to be defined?
Thanks and regards,
James
J.D. Lambert
Sustainable Design LeaderHKS
3 thumbs up
August 9, 2022 - 2:48 pm
James - How are the MEP systems designed for the project? Are they interconnected over a shared structural podium of some sort? Depending on the answer, you could submit a LEEDcoach ticket to confirm the approach for the certification (as one single building or a group of buildings) so you have it in writing that they accept it.
James Jin
3 thumbs up
August 10, 2022 - 9:05 am
(please ignore this comment)
James Jin
3 thumbs up
August 10, 2022 - 9:07 am
Hi J.D.,
From what I know, the two "buildings" have separate MEP systems - in other words, each building has its own mechanical room. The only structure that connects them is a 2-level truck ramp/loading dock and a roof. I suppose in this case that makes them two separate buildings?
Thank you for your advice - I will consider submitting a ticket to LEEDcoach.
Regards,
James
J.D. Lambert
Sustainable Design LeaderHKS
3 thumbs up
August 10, 2022 - 9:36 am
Sounds good! Then you could likely propose the group approach and create the boundary for the shared space depending on how the mechanical systems are divided since each building has it's own system.
James Jin
3 thumbs up
August 10, 2022 - 12:34 pm
That sounds like the right approach. Thanks again J.D.!