Our project team is trying to identify a crystalline waterproofing product that will be applied in the elevator shaft, but it doesn't appear that there are any crystalline waterproofing products that meet the General Emissions criteria for EQc2. Has anyone else run into this issue?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Debra a. Lombard
Construction Administrator/ LEED APBywater Woodworks, Inc.
47 thumbs up
August 14, 2018 - 4:38 pm
if the crystalline waterproofing product is used as an add mixture to the concrete, would the concrete need VOC emissions testing for v4? I assume not.
Cindy Quinn
PrincipalEcological Environments, LLC
15 thumbs up
June 4, 2020 - 7:30 pm
Were you able to resolve this? Can you share your experience? Thanks!
Gwenedd Murray
ownerre:4m consulating
2 thumbs up
June 10, 2020 - 4:41 pm
Elizabeth and CIndy - I wasn't able to find a crystalline waterproofing product that met the General Emissions requirement either. However, we did find a product, Xypex Concentrate, that we think would be considered inherently nonemitting since the only components listed on the SDS was portland cement, alkaline earth compounds, and silica sand. We hope GBCI would view this as an I.N.E. product since it did not contain any binders, polymers or resins and is zero VOCs. There is a good discussion about grout + Inherently Non-Emitting: https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/forum/inherently-non-emitting-materials.
Debra a. Lombard
Construction Administrator/ LEED APBywater Woodworks, Inc.
47 thumbs up
June 11, 2020 - 5:55 pm
Since the sds indicates this contains hex. Chromium, the product should be mentioned in all 3 plans by GC:
Stormwater/wastewater protection
Waste disposal
Indoor air quality during construction.
It appears the product since mixed with concrete would be inherently non emitting and thus not need a general emissions evaluation.
Debra
Elizabeth Kertesz
PresidentResilient Oak Consulting, LLC
9 thumbs up
June 11, 2020 - 6:02 pm
Hi Gwenedd, I think that's the same product we ended up using on my project, and I agree with the justification that it is inherently non-emitting. Thanks!