I'm in need of guidance regarding the documentation process for the Heat Island Reduction credit. Our project centers around a commercial tower, which is owned by our client. However, the external area beyond the building's footprint is owned by a different entity, and for this reason, we have excluded it from our LEED boundary.
1. Is it accurate to exclude the external walkways and hardscape areas leading to the building due to their different ownership?
2. Assuming this exclusion is correct, should we report a value of 'zero' for both non-roof measures and site paving area in the form? Please advise if I'm incorrect.
Just to provide some context, our building is situated on a podium level, which accommodates five other distinct buildings that are beyond the scope of our project. Your assistance on this matter is highly appreciated
emily reese moody
Sustainability Director, Certifications & ComplianceJacobs
LEEDuser Expert
475 thumbs up
September 2, 2024 - 2:52 pm
Hi Wafa,
I would think this project has a zero lot line, which is typical in dense urban areas. In this case, you do not include the circulation areas outside of your project boundary. You would have a 0 in those areas on the form. You should probably include a little description on the form for the review to make sure they understand this scenario.