Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Clarification on Baseline System Type and Exceptional Calculation for Phased Data Center Project

Dear Forum Members,

We are currently working on a multi-phase data center project pursuing LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction certification as a single combined project across all phases. The overall development consists of four data center blocks, each with independent HVAC systems, and design for the first block has recently commenced.

The facility is functionally divided into:

  • Critical areas: data halls and electromechanical rooms (e.g., IT rooms, battery rooms, PDU rooms).

  • Non-critical areas: office spaces.

Project highlights:

  • Data halls are served by air-cooled chillers.

  • Electromechanical rooms are housed in modular steel containers, which are fully conditioned.

    • Some of these containers are served by Precision Air Handling Units (PAHUs) connected to the air-cooled chiller system.

    • Others are equipped with standalone DX systems.

  • Office areas are conditioned using VRF systems.

We are seeking guidance on the following questions related to the baseline HVAC system assignment and use of the exceptional calculation method, as per ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Appendix G:

  1. Baseline HVAC System Type Determination:
    Since the project will be certified as a single LEED project, should the baseline system be selected based on the total combined conditioned floor area of all four blocks, or should it be determined individually per block, considering each has its own HVAC system?

  2. Treatment of Modular Container Rooms:
    The electromechanical spaces inside modular steel containers are served by a mix of systems — some with PAHUs connected to the central air-cooled chillers, and others with dedicated DX units. Should these spaces be considered in determining the baseline system type, or do they qualify for modeling under the exceptional calculation method, given their modular nature and system diversity?

  3. Applicability of Exceptional Calculation Method:
    In a data center project, office spaces are typically regarded as non-predominant areas. However, the containerized electromechanical rooms, although critical in function, may also be non-predominant in area. Should the exceptional calculation method be applied to the office areas, the electromechanical rooms, or both?

  4. COP Comparison – Baseline vs. Proposed Systems:
    Based on the current modeling approach, the baseline has been identified as System 6 – Packaged VAV with reheat, which requires a minimum full-load COP of 2.84 for air-cooled systems, per ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Table 6.8.1A. The proposed air-cooled chillers have a minimum full-load COP of 2.80, which offers limited improvement over the baseline. Given this narrow margin, what modeling strategies can be adopted to demonstrate meaningful energy savings — for example, can part-load performance (IPLV/NPLV), redundancy, or load profiling be considered?

We would greatly appreciate insights from the community or project teams who have handled similar configurations in data center projects, especially under LEED v4.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 04/11/2025 - 19:02

1. It should be the total floor area. Not sure why you are not applying the LEED for Data Centers instead of LEED NC. 2. The exceptional calculation method is a means to show energy savings for process loads. If these systems are considered process loads then it might apply. If so it is incumbent upon you to justify an appropriate baseline. This is typcially based on standard practice for this project type in your area. 3. See exceptional calculation above. It seems like your question is really directed at selecting the baseline system. Make sure to account for the exceptions to G3.1.1 in your baseline system selection. 4. Select more efficient systems. Careful as system efficiency is a mandatory provision.

Mon, 04/14/2025 - 05:45

Thank you for your detailed response. I have a couple of follow-up questions to clarify further based on the inputs shared:
  1. Exceptional Calculation for Electromechanical Rooms:
    I had previously understood from another thread that exceptional calculation methods can be used for non-predominant areas in terms of the building's primary function — for instance, in a data center, office areas (being non-critical) can be modeled using the exceptional calculation path.
    In our case, the electromechanical rooms (like IT rooms, battery rooms, PDU rooms) are housed in modular containers and are critical to the operation of the data center but may be non-predominant in floor area.
    Could you please clarify whether such containerized electromechanical spaces can also qualify for the exceptional calculation path based on their function and size, even though they are essential to the data center’s operation?
  2. Clarification on System Efficiency Comparison:
    Regarding your point on system efficiency being a mandatory provision — I just wanted to confirm:
    Are you referring to the requirement that the proposed system efficiency (design) must comply with Tables 6.8.1 A through K of ASHRAE 90.1-2010 (i.e., minimum mandatory efficiencies), or are you suggesting that the proposed system should exceed the baseline system efficiency defined under Appendix G in order to demonstrate savings under the Optimize Energy Performance credit?
Thanks again for your support — really appreciate the guidance on navigating this for our data center project.

Tue, 04/15/2025 - 15:21

1. That is not the acceptable calculation method. See Setion G2.5. LEED has extended this method beyond those items that cannot be modeled to all claims of process load savings. It has nothing to do with baseline HVAC system selection. See Section G3.1.1 for baseline HVAC system selection. There is no exceptional calculation path associated with the containerized electromechanical spaces. There may be an exception to G3.1.1 that could apply but this is not the exceptional calculation method.  2. The proposed sysstem efficiency must meet or exceed the baseline minimum efficiencies reflected in Tables 6.8.1. This is a mandoatory provision so you cannot earn LEED certification at all without meeting this requirement. 

Tue, 04/15/2025 - 15:40

Hi Marcus, In a water-scarce region where air-cooled chillers are selected for the proposed design, how can they meet the baseline efficiency requirement when the baseline system is System 8 with water-cooled centrifugal chillers, which typically have much higher COPs?

Tue, 04/15/2025 - 17:14

The mandatory provision applies to the actual equipment installed. So in this case the air-cooled chillers installed must meet the minimum efficiency for that equipment. 

Thu, 05/15/2025 - 11:44

Hi Marcus, Reading this thread has arised a confusion regarding the 'mandatory provisions' of 90.1 appendix G.  We know that daylight & occupancy sensors are 'mandatory provisions' for certain spaces that are specified in Section 9.4. However, we had submitted a project without proposing these 'mandatory' sensors and recently received a review comment stating: "The floor plans provided in PI Project Information show that the project contains perimeter spaces where ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Section 9.4.1.4 mandatory daylight controls might be applicable. However, the MEPC does not indicate whether any spaces are modeled with daylight controls. Additionally, it is unclear whether the Section 9.4.1.2 mandatory controls have been included in this project. Provide additional documentation, such as a narrative and control drawings, to ensure that the required mandatory controls have been designed in the Proposed Case, and that the mandatory lighting controls have been modeled in the Baseline Case model as applicable. If these mandatory controls are not included in the actual design, provide the documentation to show either the design is revised or the energy penalty has been accounted for in the energy model." The last line of the comment indicates that an "energy penalty" can be accounted for in the energy model if some of the "Mandatory Provisions" are not included in a project? Is this correct, or does this exception apply specifically to daylight and occupancy sensors only?

Thu, 05/15/2025 - 14:46

The proposed gets modeled as designed. The baseline must include these mandatory provisions. So if your design doesn't include them you end up paying an energy saving penalty. This is an exemption from complying with these mandatory provisions. Not sure if these are the only ones.

Fri, 05/16/2025 - 05:43

So theoretically, some or all of the proposed HVAC equipment's efficiencies could be worse than the baseline system as long as lighting and other strategies contribute towards an overall energy saving of 5% over the baseline to comply with the prerequisite.

Fri, 05/16/2025 - 14:33

No. HVAC efficiencies are a mandatory provision and there is not an exception for that one. You must meet all of the mandatory provisons unless you can find an exception granted in a LEED Interpretation like the one for lighting controls. 

Wed, 09/03/2025 - 14:21

Hi Marcus, I have a general question about described in the post system. If the development consists of four data center blocks, each with independent systems wouldn't there be an issue with pursuing this as one certification? I have a similar situation with the project and I am not sure about what certification system to offer to the client - this is obviously one data center but the blocks are separated by architecture and systems... 

Sat, 09/20/2025 - 05:13

Hi Marcus, I have a general question based on this thread. Would the datahalls in datacenters always qualify for system 4 based on exceptional calculation (b) from section G3.1.1?

Sat, 09/20/2025 - 14:22

In a data center the data halls are typically the predominant condition. This is determined by building area. There is a note under Table G3.1.1A that references this. So you enter this table with the predominant condition and then you can find exceptions to it. If the data halls are the majority of the floor area then perhaps there may be some office spaces that would qualify for exception b that allows them to be a system 4. 

Mon, 09/22/2025 - 01:59

Hi Marcus, what would be the benchmark conditioned floor area to qualify as a predominant condition?

Mon, 09/22/2025 - 21:17

The largest space type area of the building is typically the predominant condition. 

Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:51

Hello Everyone, I am also working on a data center project, with similar situation, the project shall be developed in 5 phases, the client wants to take the entire building for certification, however in the 1st phase only one data center block shall be designed rest of 4 data center blocks shall be designed later. Each block has same area. Here in for such a scenario, how the energy model should be made, should the rest of the 4 blocks shall be taken as shell only, or should those be taken as un- conditioned. We haven't yet registered the project, but in such scenario, if we take the 4 blocks as shell then how can we yet register the project under data center? Need some guidance under which category you have registered your project for phase wise development, and how the energy modeling was done? 

Wed, 10/22/2025 - 22:05

The Reference Guide speaks to this very clearly. Essentially you are required to model it as if the project were fully built out. You need to do 5 different models, some at the initial buildout, some at the full build out. The requirements for each model are articulated in the Reference Guide. There is also a Data Center calculator for you to use. 

Fri, 11/14/2025 - 06:49

Hi Marcus, would the proposed energy consumption be captured after all the 5 phases are completed? I mean the total energy consumption of all 5 blocks. And thus, for baseline too, we would need 5 different energy models right?

Fri, 11/14/2025 - 16:16

Yes

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.