Dear Forum Members,
We are currently working on a multi-phase data center project pursuing LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction certification as a single combined project across all phases. The overall development consists of four data center blocks, each with independent HVAC systems, and design for the first block has recently commenced.
The facility is functionally divided into:
- Critical areas: data halls and electromechanical rooms (e.g., IT rooms, battery rooms, PDU rooms).
- Non-critical areas: office spaces.
Project highlights:
- Data halls are served by air-cooled chillers.
-
Electromechanical rooms are housed in modular steel containers, which are fully conditioned.
- Some of these containers are served by Precision Air Handling Units (PAHUs) connected to the air-cooled chiller system.
- Others are equipped with standalone DX systems.
- Office areas are conditioned using VRF systems.
We are seeking guidance on the following questions related to the baseline HVAC system assignment and use of the exceptional calculation method, as per ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Appendix G:
-
Baseline HVAC System Type Determination:
Since the project will be certified as a single LEED project, should the baseline system be selected based on the total combined conditioned floor area of all four blocks, or should it be determined individually per block, considering each has its own HVAC system? -
Treatment of Modular Container Rooms:
The electromechanical spaces inside modular steel containers are served by a mix of systems — some with PAHUs connected to the central air-cooled chillers, and others with dedicated DX units. Should these spaces be considered in determining the baseline system type, or do they qualify for modeling under the exceptional calculation method, given their modular nature and system diversity? -
Applicability of Exceptional Calculation Method:
In a data center project, office spaces are typically regarded as non-predominant areas. However, the containerized electromechanical rooms, although critical in function, may also be non-predominant in area. Should the exceptional calculation method be applied to the office areas, the electromechanical rooms, or both? -
COP Comparison – Baseline vs. Proposed Systems:
Based on the current modeling approach, the baseline has been identified as System 6 – Packaged VAV with reheat, which requires a minimum full-load COP of 2.84 for air-cooled systems, per ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Table 6.8.1A. The proposed air-cooled chillers have a minimum full-load COP of 2.80, which offers limited improvement over the baseline. Given this narrow margin, what modeling strategies can be adopted to demonstrate meaningful energy savings — for example, can part-load performance (IPLV/NPLV), redundancy, or load profiling be considered?
We would greatly appreciate insights from the community or project teams who have handled similar configurations in data center projects, especially under LEED v4.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5931 thumbs up
April 11, 2025 - 3:02 pm
1. It should be the total floor area. Not sure why you are not applying the LEED for Data Centers instead of LEED NC.
2. The exceptional calculation method is a means to show energy savings for process loads. If these systems are considered process loads then it might apply. If so it is incumbent upon you to justify an appropriate baseline. This is typcially based on standard practice for this project type in your area.
3. See exceptional calculation above. It seems like your question is really directed at selecting the baseline system. Make sure to account for the exceptions to G3.1.1 in your baseline system selection.
4. Select more efficient systems. Careful as system efficiency is a mandatory provision.
Anurag Ghosh
Assistant Sustainability ManagerL&T Construction
1 thumbs up
April 14, 2025 - 1:45 am
Thank you for your detailed response. I have a couple of follow-up questions to clarify further based on the inputs shared:
Exceptional Calculation for Electromechanical Rooms:
I had previously understood from another thread that exceptional calculation methods can be used for non-predominant areas in terms of the building's primary function — for instance, in a data center, office areas (being non-critical) can be modeled using the exceptional calculation path.
In our case, the electromechanical rooms (like IT rooms, battery rooms, PDU rooms) are housed in modular containers and are critical to the operation of the data center but may be non-predominant in floor area.
Could you please clarify whether such containerized electromechanical spaces can also qualify for the exceptional calculation path based on their function and size, even though they are essential to the data center’s operation?
Clarification on System Efficiency Comparison:
Regarding your point on system efficiency being a mandatory provision — I just wanted to confirm:
Are you referring to the requirement that the proposed system efficiency (design) must comply with Tables 6.8.1 A through K of ASHRAE 90.1-2010 (i.e., minimum mandatory efficiencies), or are you suggesting that the proposed system should exceed the baseline system efficiency defined under Appendix G in order to demonstrate savings under the Optimize Energy Performance credit?
Thanks again for your support — really appreciate the guidance on navigating this for our data center project.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5931 thumbs up
April 15, 2025 - 11:21 am
1. That is not the acceptable calculation method. See Setion G2.5. LEED has extended this method beyond those items that cannot be modeled to all claims of process load savings. It has nothing to do with baseline HVAC system selection. See Section G3.1.1 for baseline HVAC system selection. There is no exceptional calculation path associated with the containerized electromechanical spaces. There may be an exception to G3.1.1 that could apply but this is not the exceptional calculation method.
2. The proposed sysstem efficiency must meet or exceed the baseline minimum efficiencies reflected in Tables 6.8.1. This is a mandoatory provision so you cannot earn LEED certification at all without meeting this requirement.
Anurag Ghosh
Assistant Sustainability ManagerL&T Construction
1 thumbs up
April 15, 2025 - 11:40 am
Hi Marcus,
In a water-scarce region where air-cooled chillers are selected for the proposed design, how can they meet the baseline efficiency requirement when the baseline system is System 8 with water-cooled centrifugal chillers, which typically have much higher COPs?
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5931 thumbs up
April 15, 2025 - 1:14 pm
The mandatory provision applies to the actual equipment installed. So in this case the air-cooled chillers installed must meet the minimum efficiency for that equipment.