Is this an acceptable version?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
NC-v4 EQc2: Low emitting materials
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc2 »
CDPH Method v1.2?
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EQc2
Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EQc2
Post a new question about NC-v4 EQc2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc2 »
FAQs about EQc2:
Are throw rugs subject to the credit requirements?
What are the adhesives and sealants to be included in the documentation?
Is there a VOC budget method for this credit?
What are the limits on the VOC budget method?
Do products applied to the weather barrier need to comply with VOC thresholds?
If one part of my multicomponent wall system is not compliant, can I still get full credit?
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
530 thumbs up
May 29, 2019 - 9:24 am
CDPH v1.2 is an acceptable version. See post from Larissa Oaks (USGBC):
https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/forum/cdph-v12-2017