If the 62MZ calculator reveals that the critical zone is a zone with cooling only (with a min of 0), is that an appropriate reason to pursue Case 2?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Dylan Connelly
Mechanical EngineerIntegral Group
LEEDuser Expert
472 thumbs up
October 3, 2012 - 11:40 am
Two Thoughts
1. You need to attempt to correct the your system unless it is infeasible because of the physical constraints of the existing ventilation system. So unless you can't reset your minimum to say 30% then you need to attempt to make corrections.
2. If your minimum is 0 then you won't be able to meet Case 2 either. In Case 2, you are required to provide 10 CFM/person under ALL normal operating conditions. Obviously your zone with a minimum of 0 can't provide 10 cfm/person.