FAQs about EAp2 :

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

ASHRAE 90.1 APPENDIX G Existing Building Model including shading

We are modelling a Major Renovation Project under the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 - APPENDIX G. The building existing conditions prior to this project renovation includes solar shading devices on all facades which greatly contributes to the building energy performance. The project team is currently evaluating at LEED point-of-view if the shading should be maintained or removed. It is not clear if the baseline building should consider the shading devices as in TABLE G3.1 - Baseline Building Performance states: a. The building shall be modeled so that it does not shade itself; and also f. For existing building envelope, the baseline building shall reflect existing conditions prior to any revisions that are part of the scope of work being evaluated. I understand that the baseline model should reflect the solar shading contribution otherwise the benefit of a well-designed shading device would not be valued by ASHRAE standard. Does anyone have an answer on this issue?

4

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 09/27/2011 - 16:58

Technically it appears as if Table G3.1.5 Baseline (f) should be followed so there would be external shading in both models. Our interpretation is based on the fact that G3.1.5 Baseline (a) does not apply to existing buildings and G3.1.5 Baseline (c) only appies to new buildings.

Wed, 09/28/2011 - 19:54

Thank you very much for your reply. That is also what we understand. A further thinking on this issue raised another question: According to your interpretation, I understand the baseline model should be simulated only with its actual orientation and the 90, 180 and 270 degrees rotated models can de discarded from the simulation. Is that right?

Thu, 09/29/2011 - 00:45

Yes existing building do not have to be rotated for LEED.

Fri, 09/30/2011 - 20:55

Marcus, Don't you think it is depend on the percentage of renovation of the existing building? "Advanced Energy Modeling for LEED" states "Existing buildings with less than 50% renovations do not have to be rotated". (Page 7)

Fri, 09/30/2011 - 23:53

That statement is not correct in my opinion. The Guide is trying to summarize 90.1 and in this case does so in a confusing manner. It does not even make any logical sense. The reason you rotate a building is to capture energy savings associated with orientation. Whether a building was 25% renovated or 100% renovated it would make no difference since an existing building can't be rotated. I believe that in the case where there is new and existing building if more than 50% is new it would need to be rotated. I think this is what they were trying to get say.

Sat, 10/01/2011 - 15:01

I'm very glad that you mention that. Is there any way to request GBCI reviewer's point of view about that statement. I would like to know their opinion before submitting my LEED documents.

Sat, 10/01/2011 - 16:32

There are only two official means - a project specific CIR or an Interpretation. You can write to GBCI on their web site and ask but the response is not technically official. Expect dealys in the response either way since Greenbuild is next week.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.