Log in
LEED v2009
Retail – New construction
Energy and Atmosphere
Minimum energy performance

LEED CREDIT

Retail-NC-v2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance Required

LEEDuser’s viewpoint

Frank advice from LEED experts

LEED is changing all the time, and every project is unique. Even seasoned professionals can miss a critical detail and lose a credit or even a prerequisite at the last minute. Our expert advice guides our LEEDuser Premium members and saves you valuable time.

Credit language

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To establish the minimum level of energy efficiency for the proposed building and systems to reduce environmental and economic impacts associated with excessive energy use.

Requirements

Projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016 must demonstrate an 18% improvement for new buildings, or a 14% improvement for major renovations to existing buildings.
Option 1. Whole building energy simulation

Demonstrate a 10% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for new buildings, or a 5% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for renovations to existing buildings, compared with the baseline building performance rating. Calculate the baseline building performance rating according to the building performance rating method in Appendix G of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1) using a computer simulation model for the whole building project. Projects outside the U.S. may use a USGBC approved equivalent standard2.

Appendix G of Standard 90.1–2007 requires that the energy analysis done for the building performance rating method include all energy costs associated with the building project. To achieve points using this credit, the proposed design must meet the following criteria:

  • Compliance with the mandatory provisions (Sections 5.4, 6.4, 7.4, 8.4, 9.4, and 10.4) in Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1).
  • Inclusion of all the energy costs associated with the building project or USGBC approved equivalent.
  • Comparison against a baseline building that complies with Appendix G of Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1) or USGBC approved equivalent. There is no default process energy cost.

For the purpose of this analysis, process energy is considered to include, but is not limited to, office and general miscellaneous equipment, computers, elevators and escalators, kitchen cooking and refrigeration, laundry washing and drying, lighting exempt from the lighting power allowance (e.g., lighting integral to medical equipment), and other (e.g., waterfall pumps).

Regulated (nonprocess) energy includes lighting (for the interior, parking garage, surface parking, façade, building grounds, etc., except as noted above); heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) (for space heating, space cooling, fans, pumps, toilet exhaust, parking garage ventilation, kitchen hood exhaust, etc.); and service water heating (for domestic or space heating purposes).

Process loads shall be identical for both the baseline building performance rating and for the proposed building performance rating. However, project teams may follow the exceptional calculation method (ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007, G2.5) or USGBC approved equivalent to document measures that reduce process loads. Documentation of process load energy savings must include a list of the assumptions made for both the base and the proposed design, and theoretical or empirical information supporting these assumptions.

Many of the industry standard baseline conditions for commercial kitchen equipment and refrigeration have been defined in Tables 1–4 in the Requirements section of EA Credit 1. No additional documentation is necessary to substantiate these predefined baseline systems as industry standard. If USGBC approved equivalent addresses process loads within the standard rather than using an exceptional calculation method, demonstrate how the requirements of Tables 1-4 are being met by the standard.

Projects in California may use Title 24–2005, Part 6, in place of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007 for Option 1.

OR

Option 2 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
Option 2. Prescriptive compliance path: ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide

Comply with the prescriptive measures of the ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Retail Buildings 2006. Project teams must fully comply with all applicable criteria as established in the Advanced Energy Design Guide for the climate zone in which the building is located. Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

The building must meet the following requirements:

  • Less than 20,000 square feet (1,800 square meters).
  • Retail occupancy.

OR

Option 3 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
Option 3. Prescriptive compliance path: Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide

Comply with the prescriptive measures identified in the Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide developed by the New Buildings Institute. The building must meet the following requirements:

  • Less than 100,000 square feet (9,300 square meters).
  • Comply with Section 1, Design Process Strategies, and Section 2, Core Performance Requirements.
  • Projects less than 100,000 square feet (9,300 square meters) must comply with Section 1 and Section 2 of the Core Performance Guide.
  • Health care, warehouse, and laboratory projects are ineligible for this option.

Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

OR

Option 4. Brazil compliance path: PBE Edifica

Projects in Brazil that are certified at the “A” level under the Regulation for Energy Efficiency Labeling (PBE Edifica) program for all attributes (Envelope, Lighting, HVAC) achieve this prerequisite. The following building types cannot achieve this prerequisite using this option: Healthcare, Data Centers, Manufacturing Facilities, Warehouses, and Laboratories.

Pilot ACPs Available

The following pilot alternative compliance path is available for this prerequisite. See the pilot credit library for more information.

EApc95: Alternative Energy Performance Metric ACP

See all forum discussions about this credit »

What does it cost?

Cost estimates for this credit

On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.

Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.

This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.

Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »

Documentation toolkit

The motherlode of cheat sheets

LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.

Get the inside scoop

Our editors have written a detailed analysis of nearly every LEED credit, and LEEDuser premium members get full access. We’ll tell you whether the credit is easy to accomplish or better left alone, and we provide insider tips on how to document it successfully.

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To establish the minimum level of energy efficiency for the proposed building and systems to reduce environmental and economic impacts associated with excessive energy use.

Requirements

Projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016 must demonstrate an 18% improvement for new buildings, or a 14% improvement for major renovations to existing buildings.
Option 1. Whole building energy simulation

Demonstrate a 10% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for new buildings, or a 5% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for renovations to existing buildings, compared with the baseline building performance rating. Calculate the baseline building performance rating according to the building performance rating method in Appendix G of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1) using a computer simulation model for the whole building project. Projects outside the U.S. may use a USGBC approved equivalent standard2.

Appendix G of Standard 90.1–2007 requires that the energy analysis done for the building performance rating method include all energy costs associated with the building project. To achieve points using this credit, the proposed design must meet the following criteria:

  • Compliance with the mandatory provisions (Sections 5.4, 6.4, 7.4, 8.4, 9.4, and 10.4) in Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1).
  • Inclusion of all the energy costs associated with the building project or USGBC approved equivalent.
  • Comparison against a baseline building that complies with Appendix G of Standard 90.1–2007 (with errata but without addenda1) or USGBC approved equivalent. There is no default process energy cost.

For the purpose of this analysis, process energy is considered to include, but is not limited to, office and general miscellaneous equipment, computers, elevators and escalators, kitchen cooking and refrigeration, laundry washing and drying, lighting exempt from the lighting power allowance (e.g., lighting integral to medical equipment), and other (e.g., waterfall pumps).

Regulated (nonprocess) energy includes lighting (for the interior, parking garage, surface parking, façade, building grounds, etc., except as noted above); heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) (for space heating, space cooling, fans, pumps, toilet exhaust, parking garage ventilation, kitchen hood exhaust, etc.); and service water heating (for domestic or space heating purposes).

Process loads shall be identical for both the baseline building performance rating and for the proposed building performance rating. However, project teams may follow the exceptional calculation method (ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007, G2.5) or USGBC approved equivalent to document measures that reduce process loads. Documentation of process load energy savings must include a list of the assumptions made for both the base and the proposed design, and theoretical or empirical information supporting these assumptions.

Many of the industry standard baseline conditions for commercial kitchen equipment and refrigeration have been defined in Tables 1–4 in the Requirements section of EA Credit 1. No additional documentation is necessary to substantiate these predefined baseline systems as industry standard. If USGBC approved equivalent addresses process loads within the standard rather than using an exceptional calculation method, demonstrate how the requirements of Tables 1-4 are being met by the standard.

Projects in California may use Title 24–2005, Part 6, in place of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007 for Option 1.

OR

Option 2 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
Option 2. Prescriptive compliance path: ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide

Comply with the prescriptive measures of the ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Retail Buildings 2006. Project teams must fully comply with all applicable criteria as established in the Advanced Energy Design Guide for the climate zone in which the building is located. Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

The building must meet the following requirements:

  • Less than 20,000 square feet (1,800 square meters).
  • Retail occupancy.

OR

Option 3 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
Option 3. Prescriptive compliance path: Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide

Comply with the prescriptive measures identified in the Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide developed by the New Buildings Institute. The building must meet the following requirements:

  • Less than 100,000 square feet (9,300 square meters).
  • Comply with Section 1, Design Process Strategies, and Section 2, Core Performance Requirements.
  • Projects less than 100,000 square feet (9,300 square meters) must comply with Section 1 and Section 2 of the Core Performance Guide.
  • Health care, warehouse, and laboratory projects are ineligible for this option.

Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

OR

Option 4. Brazil compliance path: PBE Edifica

Projects in Brazil that are certified at the “A” level under the Regulation for Energy Efficiency Labeling (PBE Edifica) program for all attributes (Envelope, Lighting, HVAC) achieve this prerequisite. The following building types cannot achieve this prerequisite using this option: Healthcare, Data Centers, Manufacturing Facilities, Warehouses, and Laboratories.

Pilot ACPs Available

The following pilot alternative compliance path is available for this prerequisite. See the pilot credit library for more information.

EApc95: Alternative Energy Performance Metric ACP

See all LEEDuser forum discussions about this credit » Subscribe to new discussions about Retail-NC-v2009 EAp2