LEED Pilot Credits
LEED Pilot Credit Library
Water-Related Pilot Credits
Cooling tower water use

Pilot-Credits WEpc17: Cooling tower water use

LEEDuser overview

Frank advice from LEED experts

LEED is changing all the time, and every project is unique. Even seasoned professionals can miss a critical detail and lose a credit or even a prerequisite at the last minute. Our expert advice guides our LEEDuser Premium members and saves you valuable time.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Credit language

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To conserve water used for cooling tower makeup while controlling microbes, corrosion, and scale in the condenser water system.

Pilot Credit Closed
This pilot credit was closed to new pilot credit registrations on 3/1/2015. It is now available in the LEED Innovation Catalog for ongoing use by project teams as an innovation point rather than a pilot credit.

Requirements

* This credit language is drawn from the LEED v4 draft. Where other point totals are noted, this pilot credit is worth 1 point in total. *For cooling towers and evaporative condensers, conduct a one-time potable water analysis, in order to optimize cooling tower cycles. Measure at least the five control parameters listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Maximum concentrations for parameters in condenser water
Parameter Maximum level
Ca (as CaCO3) 1,000 ppm
Total alkalinity 1,000 ppm
SiO2 100 ppm
Cl- 250 ppm
Conductivity 2000 µS/cm
ppm = parts per million µS/cm = micro siemens per centimeter Calculate the number of cooling tower cycles by dividing the maximum allowed concentration level of each parameter by the actual concentration level of each parameter found in the potable makeup water. Limit cooling tower cycles to avoid exceeding maximum values for any of these parameters.
Table 2. Points for cooling tower cycles
Cooling tower cycles Points
Maximum number of cycles achieved without exceeding any filtration levels or affecting operation of condenser water system (up to maximum of 10 cycles) 1
Achieve a minimum 10 cycles by increasing the level of treatment in condenser or make-up water
OR
Achieve the number of cycles for 1 point and use a minimum 20% recycled nonpotable water
2

General Pilot Documentation Requirements

Register for the pilot credit Credits 1-14 Credits 15-27 Credits 28-42 Credits 43-56 Credits 57-67 Credits 68-82 Credits 83--96
Credit specific
Provide the following:
  1. A water analysis measuring as a minimum the five control parameters measured in ppm or mg/l.
  2. Narrative describing the water treatment system and the number of cycles which the cooling tower can achieve without exceeding the control parameters. The narrative should also include the predicted acceptable corrosion rates for each pipe material within the condenser water system.
Additional questions:
none
Changes
  • Changes made for 2nd Public Comment (08/01/2011): Separate language for EBOM projects to conform with new EBOM rating system structure Added Healthcare as an applicable rating system type. Clarification of cooling tower analysis process which requires a one time potable water analysis, following by an assessment of the maximum number of cycles appropriate to the project, along with additional measures to improve cooling tower efficiency.
  • Changes made for 3rd Public Comment (03/01/2012): Removed CI & Retail CI from applicable rating systems Removed equipment requirements from EB:O&M Separated EBOM & BD+C submittal requirements to reflect change to EBOM requirements.
  • Changes made for 5th Public Comment (1/15/2013): Updated tables to align with 5th Public Comment changes to LEED v4 WEc3. Removed additional BD+C documentation requirements that correspond to WEp2 from v4 draft.
See all forum discussions about this credit »

Frequently asked questions

No results found
See all forum discussions about this credit »

What does it cost?

Cost estimates for this credit

On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.

Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.

This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.

Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Checklists

Step by step to LEED certification

LEEDuser’s checklists walk you through the key action steps you need to earn a credit, including how to avoid common pitfalls and save money.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Documentation toolkit

The motherlode of cheat sheets

LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now


Addenda

This credit has no LEEDuser summary

See all forum discussions about this credit »
Guest expert
Default Avatar

Robert Benazzi

Jaros Baaum & Bolles
Partner Emeritus

LEEDuser overview

Frank advice from LEED experts

LEED is changing all the time, and every project is unique. Even seasoned professionals can miss a critical detail and lose a credit or even a prerequisite at the last minute. Our expert advice guides our LEEDuser Premium members and saves you valuable time.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Credit language

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To conserve water used for cooling tower makeup while controlling microbes, corrosion, and scale in the condenser water system.

Pilot Credit Closed
This pilot credit was closed to new pilot credit registrations on 3/1/2015. It is now available in the LEED Innovation Catalog for ongoing use by project teams as an innovation point rather than a pilot credit.

Requirements

* This credit language is drawn from the LEED v4 draft. Where other point totals are noted, this pilot credit is worth 1 point in total. *For cooling towers and evaporative condensers, conduct a one-time potable water analysis, in order to optimize cooling tower cycles. Measure at least the five control parameters listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Maximum concentrations for parameters in condenser water
Parameter Maximum level
Ca (as CaCO3) 1,000 ppm
Total alkalinity 1,000 ppm
SiO2 100 ppm
Cl- 250 ppm
Conductivity 2000 µS/cm
ppm = parts per million µS/cm = micro siemens per centimeter Calculate the number of cooling tower cycles by dividing the maximum allowed concentration level of each parameter by the actual concentration level of each parameter found in the potable makeup water. Limit cooling tower cycles to avoid exceeding maximum values for any of these parameters.
Table 2. Points for cooling tower cycles
Cooling tower cycles Points
Maximum number of cycles achieved without exceeding any filtration levels or affecting operation of condenser water system (up to maximum of 10 cycles) 1
Achieve a minimum 10 cycles by increasing the level of treatment in condenser or make-up water
OR
Achieve the number of cycles for 1 point and use a minimum 20% recycled nonpotable water
2

General Pilot Documentation Requirements

Register for the pilot credit Credits 1-14 Credits 15-27 Credits 28-42 Credits 43-56 Credits 57-67 Credits 68-82 Credits 83--96
Credit specific
Provide the following:
  1. A water analysis measuring as a minimum the five control parameters measured in ppm or mg/l.
  2. Narrative describing the water treatment system and the number of cycles which the cooling tower can achieve without exceeding the control parameters. The narrative should also include the predicted acceptable corrosion rates for each pipe material within the condenser water system.
Additional questions:
none
Changes
  • Changes made for 2nd Public Comment (08/01/2011): Separate language for EBOM projects to conform with new EBOM rating system structure Added Healthcare as an applicable rating system type. Clarification of cooling tower analysis process which requires a one time potable water analysis, following by an assessment of the maximum number of cycles appropriate to the project, along with additional measures to improve cooling tower efficiency.
  • Changes made for 3rd Public Comment (03/01/2012): Removed CI & Retail CI from applicable rating systems Removed equipment requirements from EB:O&M Separated EBOM & BD+C submittal requirements to reflect change to EBOM requirements.
  • Changes made for 5th Public Comment (1/15/2013): Updated tables to align with 5th Public Comment changes to LEED v4 WEc3. Removed additional BD+C documentation requirements that correspond to WEp2 from v4 draft.
See all forum discussions about this credit »

Documentation toolkit

The motherlode of cheat sheets

LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now


Guest expert
Default Avatar

Robert Benazzi

Jaros Baaum & Bolles
Partner Emeritus