LEEDuser’s viewpoint
Explore this LEED credit
Post your questions on this credit in the forum, and click on the credit language tab to review to the LEED requirements.
Credit language
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
Intent
Pilot Credit Closed
This pilot credit is closed to new registrations
To reward project teams for selecting products that are assessed using accepted risk assessment methodologies for installation and use of building products.
Requirements
Use at least 5 different permanently installed products from at least two different manufacturers with validated hazard assessment and exposure assessments for each substance.
Hazard Assessment
- The manufacturer has completed a screening level hazard assessment for each substance in the building product present in concentrations greater than 1000 ppm for each endpoint below:
- Carcinogenicity
- Mutagenicity/Genotoxicity
- Reproductive & Developmental Toxicity
- Acute Toxicity
- Eye and Skin Irritation
- Aspiration hazard
- Chronic toxicity Skin & Respiratory Sensitization
- Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure)
- Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure)
Table 1.
Endpoint |
GHS Hazard Criteria If a substance falls into any category listed, it is triggered for exposure assessment. |
---|---|
Carcinogenicity (C) | Category 1, 2 |
Mutagenicity & Genotoxicity (M) | Category 1, 2 |
Reproductive Toxicity (R) | Category 1, 2 |
Acute Mammalian Toxicity (AT) (oral, dermal, and inhalation routes) | Category 1,2,3 |
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure) | Category 1 |
Skin Irritation (IrS) | Category 1, 2 |
Eye Irritation (IrE) | Category 1 or 2A |
Aspiration Hazard | Category 1 |
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure) | Category 1, 2 |
Skin Sensitization (SnS) | Category 1A (or 1 if not sub-categorized) |
Respiratory Sensitization (SnR) | Category 1A (or 1 if not sub-categorized) |
Exposure Assessment
- Perform an exposure assessment for the flagged substance(s) using authoritative approaches consistent with ECETOC TRA, or equivalent or higher tier exposure tool, assessing exposures during product installation and product use. Document assumptions about when and how exposure occurs.
- Employ authoritative appoaches for the result calculation, such as a risk characterization ratio (RCR), consistent with methods used by US EPA, European Chemicals Agency, or Environment Canada/Health Canada. Use data from the following sources to estimate exposure using the scenarios above for construction workers, installers and building occupants.
- Chemical reference values must be sourced from peer-reviewed data, preferably recognized authoritative agencies, publications, and databases such as:
- International Toxicity Estimates for Risk (ITER)
- National Library of Medicine ToxNET meta-database for toxicology information
- GESTIS DNEL database
- Alternatively, reference values can be derived from points of departure from rigorous toxicological studies provided assessors disclose the point of departure value and any mathematical extrapolations to a lower exposure limit.
- In the absence of empirically derived data, computer modeling or read across values can be used to fill data gaps but data sources and assumptions must be disclosed.
- Chemical reference values must be sourced from peer-reviewed data, preferably recognized authoritative agencies, publications, and databases such as:
- Report risks from each exposure pathway (e.g. inhalation, dermal, oral)
- Combine risks from each exposure pathway in a screening level assessment for a total safety result, which must produce a Risk Characterization Ratio less than or equal to one.
- For higher tier assessment techniques, risks will be added only when exposure pathways produce effects using the same mode of action.
Submittals
General
- Participate in the LEEDuser pilot credit forum
- Complete the feedback survey:
Changes
- Closed for registration on 8/12/2022
Not pursuing this pilot but have a comment you'd like to share with USGBC?
Click here to submit your commentWhat does it cost?
Cost estimates for this credit
On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.
Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.
This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.
Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »Frequently asked questions
See all forum discussions about this credit »Documentation toolkit
The motherlode of cheat sheets
LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
Intent
Pilot Credit Closed
This pilot credit is closed to new registrations
To reward project teams for selecting products that are assessed using accepted risk assessment methodologies for installation and use of building products.
Requirements
Use at least 5 different permanently installed products from at least two different manufacturers with validated hazard assessment and exposure assessments for each substance.
Hazard Assessment
- The manufacturer has completed a screening level hazard assessment for each substance in the building product present in concentrations greater than 1000 ppm for each endpoint below:
- Carcinogenicity
- Mutagenicity/Genotoxicity
- Reproductive & Developmental Toxicity
- Acute Toxicity
- Eye and Skin Irritation
- Aspiration hazard
- Chronic toxicity Skin & Respiratory Sensitization
- Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure)
- Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure)
Table 1.
Endpoint |
GHS Hazard Criteria If a substance falls into any category listed, it is triggered for exposure assessment. |
---|---|
Carcinogenicity (C) | Category 1, 2 |
Mutagenicity & Genotoxicity (M) | Category 1, 2 |
Reproductive Toxicity (R) | Category 1, 2 |
Acute Mammalian Toxicity (AT) (oral, dermal, and inhalation routes) | Category 1,2,3 |
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure) | Category 1 |
Skin Irritation (IrS) | Category 1, 2 |
Eye Irritation (IrE) | Category 1 or 2A |
Aspiration Hazard | Category 1 |
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure) | Category 1, 2 |
Skin Sensitization (SnS) | Category 1A (or 1 if not sub-categorized) |
Respiratory Sensitization (SnR) | Category 1A (or 1 if not sub-categorized) |
Exposure Assessment
- Perform an exposure assessment for the flagged substance(s) using authoritative approaches consistent with ECETOC TRA, or equivalent or higher tier exposure tool, assessing exposures during product installation and product use. Document assumptions about when and how exposure occurs.
- Employ authoritative appoaches for the result calculation, such as a risk characterization ratio (RCR), consistent with methods used by US EPA, European Chemicals Agency, or Environment Canada/Health Canada. Use data from the following sources to estimate exposure using the scenarios above for construction workers, installers and building occupants.
- Chemical reference values must be sourced from peer-reviewed data, preferably recognized authoritative agencies, publications, and databases such as:
- International Toxicity Estimates for Risk (ITER)
- National Library of Medicine ToxNET meta-database for toxicology information
- GESTIS DNEL database
- Alternatively, reference values can be derived from points of departure from rigorous toxicological studies provided assessors disclose the point of departure value and any mathematical extrapolations to a lower exposure limit.
- In the absence of empirically derived data, computer modeling or read across values can be used to fill data gaps but data sources and assumptions must be disclosed.
- Chemical reference values must be sourced from peer-reviewed data, preferably recognized authoritative agencies, publications, and databases such as:
- Report risks from each exposure pathway (e.g. inhalation, dermal, oral)
- Combine risks from each exposure pathway in a screening level assessment for a total safety result, which must produce a Risk Characterization Ratio less than or equal to one.
- For higher tier assessment techniques, risks will be added only when exposure pathways produce effects using the same mode of action.
Submittals
General
- Participate in the LEEDuser pilot credit forum
- Complete the feedback survey:
Changes
- Closed for registration on 8/12/2022