| Topic | Recent |
|---|---|
Ireland Climate ZoneCS-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by James Duggan on Jul 20, 2017, 5:03 am
Hi all, Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jul 20, 2017, 10:06 am |
|
"Box" within an exisiting WarehouseNC-v4 MPR2: Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Gina Dederer on Feb 3, 2017, 9:15 am
Our particular project consists of a 400sqm 1 floor "Box" (walls and roof) to be built in its entirety inside a much larger existing warehouse, which itself is part of a large industrial complex... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Feb 7, 2017, 12:22 pm |
|
Enhanced Commissioning- Final UploadCS-v4 EAp1: Fundamental commissioning and verificationposted by John Fingleton on Feb 4, 2016, 10:47 am
Hello, Last reply: Scott Bowman, Jan 19, 2017, 5:04 pm |
|
Core and Shell project with public bike scheme adjacentCS-v4 LTc5: Access to quality transitposted by Sean Hogan on Oct 16, 2014, 6:17 am
Our project seeking C&S certification for and existing building redevelopment. We are providing bikes and changing facilities within the building and a... Last reply: Marilyn Specht, Jan 17, 2017, 4:47 pm |
|
Building Envelope Air infiltrationCS-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Francis McNulty on Jan 16, 2017, 1:08 pm
Hi All, I am trying to establish if a project can take benefit in the energy model for an improved air... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jan 16, 2017, 3:08 pm |
|
LEED v3 Campus DeadlineHealthcare-v2009 MPR3: Must use a reasonable site boundaryposted by Francis McNulty on Oct 4, 2016, 9:36 am
We are working on a project with 4 office buildings and a multi-storey car park. We are unsure whether to go for campus certification as the project is phased. There is a masterplan to include a... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Nov 18, 2016, 12:20 pm |
|
> 75% M&V Template RequirementCS-2009 EAc5.2: Measurement and verification - tenant submeteringposted by Martin Meehan on Aug 15, 2016, 10:27 am
Dear all, Our project recently received the comment below which appears to require an Option B or D 'template' to be submitted with our plan if a tenant is to take 75% or more of the... Last reply: Emmanuel Pauwels, Sep 30, 2016, 12:34 pm |
|
Lawn acceptanceNC-2009 SSc5.1: Site development - protect or restore habitatposted by Francis McNulty on Sep 27, 2016, 12:53 pm
Hi, We have received comments on the lawn areas of our project which states “lawn is acceptable only if it a) is not a monoculture, b) does not require regular maintenance or mowing, and c... Last reply: RETIRED, Sep 27, 2016, 2:08 pm |
|
Calculator Points clarificationPilot-Credits MRpc102: Legal Woodposted by Francis McNulty on Aug 26, 2016, 8:07 am
Can you clarify the number of points available for this ACP? I believe it is 1 but if in the Validation Tap all statements for the point allocations are 'True' then the figure comes to 2. ... |
|
Window Assembly- LBNL vs European SoftwareNC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Martin Meehan on Aug 8, 2016, 6:21 am
Dear all, Our project recently received the comment below regarding window... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Aug 9, 2016, 9:28 am |
