| Topic | Recent |
|---|---|
Verified Construction & Demolition Recycling Rates PilotPilot-Credits MRpc87: Verified Construction & Demolition Recycling Ratesposted by Juliana Moreira on Sep 27, 2017, 6:52 amRETIRED LEEDuser Expert 622 thumbs up September 27, 2017- 12:03 pm Juliana- Thanks for your inquiry. Although this is indeed a innovation credit idea, you'll probably get a better response posting your question under this pilot credit's forum- https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/credit/Pilot-Credits/MRpc87. Log in or register to post comments Tristan Roberts Representative Vermont House of Representatives LEEDuser Expert 11471 thumbs up September 27, 2017- 12:36 pm Well, this is cool! On our new LEEDuser site I can just move a comment to the correct forum. It's here now! Log in or register... Last reply: Juliana Moreira, Feb 1, 2018, 3:29 am |
|
Energy Modelling- United KingdomNC-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Fleur Baguley on Jun 23, 2016, 11:50 am
Hi, I have a project in the UK. For schemes such as... Last reply: Juliana Moreira, Jan 24, 2018, 12:00 pm |
|
LAB21EBOM-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Ivan Blazevic on Sep 19, 2017, 11:35 am
Can a project (with adeqaute proportion of lab area) located in the United Kingdom benchmark its performance against Lab21 tool data? Last reply: Ben Stanley, Jan 11, 2018, 1:29 pm |
|
ElevatorsNC-v4 EAc2: Optimize Energy Performanceposted by John McCullough on Jan 5, 2018, 7:26 am
I have managed to create a rather impressive energy reduction between the baseline and proposed elevators. I am using IES software to the energy calculations and I have both baseline and proposed... Last reply: John McCullough, Jan 5, 2018, 10:13 am |
|
EAc1 baseline and proposed systemsNC-v4 EAc2: Optimize Energy Performanceposted by John McCullough on Dec 21, 2017, 10:01 am
The problem I am having is that I have to select a system for the baseline model which is System 7... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Dec 21, 2017, 11:14 am |
|
Non-smoking signage requirement / location for LEEDv4 CICI-v4 EQp2: Environmental tobacco smoke controlposted by Meike Borchers on Jul 7, 2017, 8:27 am
Hi, we are looking at LEEDv4 CI for a project in London. By UK law it is not permitted to smoke inside office buildings, and the floors of the office building we look to certify are for more than... Last reply: Meike Borchers, Sep 25, 2017, 8:35 am |
|
Visitor parking onlyCI-v4 LTc5: Reduced parking footprintposted by Karen Elliott on Sep 15, 2017, 5:51 am
We have an large office space in Central London that has 2 car parking spaces, but the staff will not be able to use them. They will only be used in exceptional circumstances for visitors. It is... Last reply: Landry Watson, Sep 15, 2017, 5:43 pm |
|
Switching between Options 1 and 2CI-v4 EAc2: Optimize Energy Performanceposted by Meike Borchers on Sep 1, 2017, 7:47 am
We have submitted our initial design stage submittal and received commentary on our Option 2 approach - Prescriptive compliance. However, we have since carried out energy simulation and found... |
|
Transportation Planning HandbookNC-v4 LTc7: Reduced parking footprintposted by Susannah Goddard on Jan 15, 2016, 11:46 am
I don't have a copy of this to hand but need to know the content of Tables 18-2 to 18-4. Am I required to purchase a copy of this book in order to determine the appropriate base ratios, or are... Last reply: Kimberly Schlaepfer, Aug 31, 2017, 6:53 pm |
|
Can this credit be achieved if no minimum local code requirementCI-v4 LTc5: Reduced parking footprintposted by Juliana Moreira on Apr 26, 2017, 10:46 am
I am working on an office fitout in central London where there are no minimum local code requirements for parking spaces. The code actually limits the amount of parking spaces to a maximum of 1... Last reply: emily reese moody, Aug 28, 2017, 1:50 am |
