4026 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
LEED OnLine now LEED Off Line?Navigating LEED Onlineposted by Kelly Ingalls on Sep 20, 2018, 11:44 pmLEED On Line Version 2009 is no longer functional? I've spent several hours this week trying to resolve Adobe Reader issues (DC etc.) with no success. I've been advised by Technology that I should use the LEED OffLine option. This will be a time-consuming and inefficient option. My clients should be able to access LOL to see the updates for their project status and LEED credits. Oh, and I'm using a MAC with Windows Parallel and Safari. Yikes. I've asked Technology to advise what is the best option (PC based? Internet Explorer? Adobe Reader DC or 11? Any comments? ... Last reply: emily reese moody, May 21, 2021, 3:12 pm |
|
MR4-vs- MR7 creditsNC-2009 MRc7: Certified Woodposted by Esther Kohout on Jul 30, 2014, 2:38 pmor it can count toward MRc4, but not both, at the option of the project team. If it bears an FSC Recycled (X% or Credit) claim, then it can only count toward MRc4. There are lots of post-consumer recycled... Last reply: Jason Grant, Feb 17, 2015, 2:15 pm |
|
Any success with this credit yet?Pilot-Credits INpc113: Informing Design Using Triple Bottom Line Analysisposted by Sophie Kerr on Oct 29, 2018, 4:11 pmare using Autocase to document Triple Bottom Line Analysis on a new construction residence hall. I had been wanting to pursue this credit for multiple projects. However, this is the first where the Owner... Last reply: Rachael Johnson, Mar 20, 2023, 1:05 pm |
|
November Surprise?NC-v4.1 MRc5: Construction and demolition waste managementposted by Jonathan Weiss on Nov 24, 2020, 3:41 pmproject design innovations and other "upstream" zero waste strategies, while still allowing end of life waste diversion to play a role in LEED. If you have feedback on the C&D credit changes... Last reply: Chloe Bendistis, Sep 1, 2021, 12:53 pm |
|
LEED 2012 must be approved by a quorum of the Consensus bodyGeneral forumsposted by Rob Watson on May 15, 2012, 1:50 pmThey have backed out changes with each new draft, so it's not nearly as extreme as it was originally. I agree that the changes will be a lot for teams to take on, but I think that the benefit of retiring... Last reply: Rob Watson, May 31, 2012, 11:55 am |
|
Appropriate time for submitting the Preliminary Design ReviewLEED Reviews: Appeals, Design/Construction Submittals, and moreposted by Shivani Langer on Apr 15, 2013, 1:50 pma lot of time working on clarifications/narratives during review because we are missing information that the reviewers are looking for. Submitting the design review (deferring those credits until... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Apr 16, 2013, 2:53 pm |
|
Commingled waste as one or multiple material streams?NC-v4 MRc5: Construction and demolition waste managementposted by Janika McFeely on Jan 9, 2015, 6:15 pmover the same recycling line are counted as one stream in LEED, even if the processing facility separates the output into multiple materials for recovery after processing." Log in or register... Last reply: riiupw epics, Dec 5, 2020, 4:48 am |
|
Structural Steel Backup LettersNC-v4 MRc3: Building product disclosure and optimization - sourcing of raw materialsposted by Michelle Rosenberger on Aug 19, 2019, 12:57 pmbut that was an ID+C project that did not include a lot of steel or structural materials. Most of the recycled content contributions came from the furniture and we were actually able to document more than double... Last reply: Nash Emrich, Sep 9, 2021, 2:31 pm |
|
v4.1 EPD Option 2 (optimization)- no viable way to mandate this in construction specs!NC-v4.1 MRc2: Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Joanna Switzer on Apr 17, 2020, 2:38 pmwill not be renewed. Instead Interface has replaced that backing in their line-up with "CQuest GB" and I am told that they have been producing and shipping the CQuest GB for orders submitted with GlasBacRe... Last reply: Lauren Richardson, Jan 29, 2024, 10:14 am |
|
Documentation Costs?General forumsposted by Ellen Mitchell on Mar 16, 2012, 3:18 pmto be tough to also ask them to pay a premium to have their strategies documented within this unnecessarily complicated framework. I am concerned that because of this, we are going to see a lot more clients... Last reply: Rob Watson, May 9, 2012, 2:31 pm |